• Instead of replying +1 / -1, rather use the buttons to upvote or downvote.

Declined Allow the votemenu to be used by trusted members instead of just VIP's

Status
Not open for further replies.

jahstice

Active Member
Jul 30, 2019
37
5
63
Having to pay nearly 35$+ to be allowed to votekick or votemute someone is so obscene, instead, you should allow trusted members to be allowed to votekick of votemute based off the amount of reports and how well they're liked in the community to prevent it from being abused, you shouldn't have to pay to kick someone who's breaking the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martin James

Green.

Maniac
Dec 7, 2019
560
185
123
Algeria
1. If a member is trusted enough, most times they are a staff member.
2. There are restrictions around these votes, since you have to call staff anyhow.

-1
Voteban has been avalible to the public before, And it got heavliy abused. And making a system for trusted people would be favourism mostly. -1
Changed my vote to -1 due to above
 

Floot

Newbie
★ Donor ★
Dec 9, 2017
2,687
1,252
258
under a rock, on a tropical island
No
There was an experiment conducted before where voting was made temporarily public. It was heavily abused.
The only person you can trust on Wonderland are the staff members. (Mods, admin)

One can still use the !calladmin command and remember that even VIPs have to do this, They cannot just votekick/ban/mute/gag anyone for no reason. If this was done, it would be considered as a VIP power abuse and the Donator can be reported thus terminating his perks.

Also, you do not 'pay' for this service. It is a token of appreciation for your donation.
 

MissMaye

The Overseer
★ Donor ★
Honorary Member ★
Jul 16, 2017
985
237
138
ab0.jpg


Everybody liked ender, everybody liked brass shrimp, everybody liked shaduw-- well okay maybe thats a step outta line. point is, if it CAN be abused, it WILL be. Without parroting things already said, -1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.