A disclaimer of sorts: this is not an appeal, but more of a protest, or pointing out what i see as flawed.
Armani's Ban Appeal can be seen here:
Armani's Appeal
Some 4 months ago the player Armani Quesadilla was banned for allegedly planning a raid against the WL community. Not only was this false, but the punishment was overly harsh for the circumstance. What Armani said was taken out of context and if the rest of the conversation was revealed it would become clear that he was making a joke. Another problem with the permaban, is that Armani had no power to Raid WL, either on the Discord, on the forums, or even in game. He never could have done any long lasting damage, even if for some reason the threat was serious, so banning him had no practical reason either. the only way i could see a permaban being justified is if Armani had been banned multiple times before for other offenses, but this is the first recorded ban on his account. and As the cherry on top, 2 out of the 3 Admins who have been said to manage the case, both had some level of bias against Armani, and admitted to personally disliking him.
All i am saying is that Armani's case was poorly investigated, his punishment was overly harsh, and the outcome was influenced by bias to some extent
Armani's Ban Appeal can be seen here:
Armani's Appeal
Some 4 months ago the player Armani Quesadilla was banned for allegedly planning a raid against the WL community. Not only was this false, but the punishment was overly harsh for the circumstance. What Armani said was taken out of context and if the rest of the conversation was revealed it would become clear that he was making a joke. Another problem with the permaban, is that Armani had no power to Raid WL, either on the Discord, on the forums, or even in game. He never could have done any long lasting damage, even if for some reason the threat was serious, so banning him had no practical reason either. the only way i could see a permaban being justified is if Armani had been banned multiple times before for other offenses, but this is the first recorded ban on his account. and As the cherry on top, 2 out of the 3 Admins who have been said to manage the case, both had some level of bias against Armani, and admitted to personally disliking him.
All i am saying is that Armani's case was poorly investigated, his punishment was overly harsh, and the outcome was influenced by bias to some extent