So here's a collection of a couple different things i want to get some attention on:
Jailbreak
I don’t know if I’m the only person that think that’s logical, but I’ve killed a lot people for it already, and now I’ve been getting some information that at least 3 other staff members don’t think so?
1.2 But then again, if you don’t do the order you’re KOS anyway, which is my second point: If you don’t do the order you’re KOS. Simple. But if you can delay and detour, without the warden saying the command “no detours or delays”, people will abuse that regardless if it’s a thing. The only ruling (as listed at the top) about delaying is listed under General Jailbreak Rules. So why should wardens say it, if you’re delaying the round intentionally by not doing the wardens order?
Wardens not being able to slay whilst staff is on
So i was told by Eight that if staff is on, Wardens shouldn't be using their /wslay, as it is considered backseat moderating.
If it is considering backseat moderating why even give the option to slay a blue?
I was given the "reasoning" if you can call it that: "Why do we give VIP's vote commands?". It's a way of saying thank you, a special perk for those who help out the community. Not to backseat moderate. Just like in Jailbreak where wardens have the option to slay people, if they don't comply because they are on the same team.
I seriously don't see the problem with allowing them to use it, even whilst staff is on, since its at their disposal and the worst that can happen is someone getting slayed falsely, and they can be respawned. Instead of the staff member asking for the reasoning behind the thought of slaying, every time that the warden wants to slay someone, the warden could just briefly explain why, or if the staff member has seen it, he/she could just slay instead of waiting for the vote.
If the staff member is on red, having to follow orders whilst administrating/moderating is a nightmare. You simply cannot do it properly. The wardens should, yet again, be able to use it for these situations, so they don't get restricted to being a shrimp whilst playing because a staff is there.
Unspoken rules, that isn't written down anywhere
1. Wardens not being able to slay whilst staff is on.
>It's dumb. Just list it.
A re-do of the Rebel status rules?
1.1 With the current system that is implemented on the servers, a red that attacks any guard for any reason, is a rebeller. Guard baiting? Hit them to go away? REBELLER. Lets say that all reds failed to do an order and the warden wanted to pardon them. According to the rules he can only pardon all of them, otherwise it would be favoritism, but he cant pardon the one guy because he has the rebeller status, which is dumb and contradicting.
1.2 If staff are the only ones to define it, why not just make a simple way of understanding it, instead of having 25 (somewhat) different definitions of it? I get that staff should be smarter than most of the players, but it's still a massive point of confusion when i tell people that make their custom last requests involve a red,
I don't wanna hear the reasoning "its common knowledge". No its not. We're talking about the internet. There is no common knowledge and everyone needs a simple & clear way of understanding things cut in pieces and served on a plate.
Jailbreak
- Do not delay the round or stall the round.
I don’t know if I’m the only person that think that’s logical, but I’ve killed a lot people for it already, and now I’ve been getting some information that at least 3 other staff members don’t think so?
1.2 But then again, if you don’t do the order you’re KOS anyway, which is my second point: If you don’t do the order you’re KOS. Simple. But if you can delay and detour, without the warden saying the command “no detours or delays”, people will abuse that regardless if it’s a thing. The only ruling (as listed at the top) about delaying is listed under General Jailbreak Rules. So why should wardens say it, if you’re delaying the round intentionally by not doing the wardens order?
Wardens not being able to slay whilst staff is on
So i was told by Eight that if staff is on, Wardens shouldn't be using their /wslay, as it is considered backseat moderating.
If it is considering backseat moderating why even give the option to slay a blue?
I was given the "reasoning" if you can call it that: "Why do we give VIP's vote commands?". It's a way of saying thank you, a special perk for those who help out the community. Not to backseat moderate. Just like in Jailbreak where wardens have the option to slay people, if they don't comply because they are on the same team.
I seriously don't see the problem with allowing them to use it, even whilst staff is on, since its at their disposal and the worst that can happen is someone getting slayed falsely, and they can be respawned. Instead of the staff member asking for the reasoning behind the thought of slaying, every time that the warden wants to slay someone, the warden could just briefly explain why, or if the staff member has seen it, he/she could just slay instead of waiting for the vote.
If the staff member is on red, having to follow orders whilst administrating/moderating is a nightmare. You simply cannot do it properly. The wardens should, yet again, be able to use it for these situations, so they don't get restricted to being a shrimp whilst playing because a staff is there.
Unspoken rules, that isn't written down anywhere
1. Wardens not being able to slay whilst staff is on.
>It's dumb. Just list it.
A re-do of the Rebel status rules?
- Rebels can be pardoned when their rebel status goes away,
- Only staff can define what favouritism is.
1.1 With the current system that is implemented on the servers, a red that attacks any guard for any reason, is a rebeller. Guard baiting? Hit them to go away? REBELLER. Lets say that all reds failed to do an order and the warden wanted to pardon them. According to the rules he can only pardon all of them, otherwise it would be favoritism, but he cant pardon the one guy because he has the rebeller status, which is dumb and contradicting.
1.2 If staff are the only ones to define it, why not just make a simple way of understanding it, instead of having 25 (somewhat) different definitions of it? I get that staff should be smarter than most of the players, but it's still a massive point of confusion when i tell people that make their custom last requests involve a red,
I don't wanna hear the reasoning "its common knowledge". No its not. We're talking about the internet. There is no common knowledge and everyone needs a simple & clear way of understanding things cut in pieces and served on a plate.